katook
Junior Member
Posts: 58
|
Post by katook on Apr 4, 2024 23:42:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by srossi on Apr 5, 2024 0:07:23 GMT
Law Enforcement Today. LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Sin on Apr 5, 2024 3:34:02 GMT
That fucking asshole! He's a complete cunt. He convinces dumbasses to do dumb shit because he's a "constitutional scholar" and he'll help them get off. How did he get the title of "constitutional scholar"? Some people who watched his Youtubes called him a "constitutional scholar," despite the fact that he seems to have very little understanding of the Constitution or the law. Now he uses that as his business title and people use him instead of a lawyer because they don't understand that he's just some dildo in a suit with a Youtube Channel.
When he sees a cop pull someone over he walk up to the scene and starts recording with multiple phones. He has no concern for the privacy of the person being pulled over or the safety of anyone involved or the people driving by. He claims to be a member of the press so it's his right to stick his phones in the driver's face while they are being questioned. He says it's to prevent the police from assaulting the person.
In the video I saw the cop was totally cool, and asked him to respect the privacy of the driver and to stand some distance away so their personal details weren't recorded. Of course he cunted off and then whined like his rights were being violated and then got physical with the cop.
|
|
|
|
Post by KGB on Apr 5, 2024 11:26:27 GMT
I can't remember seeing any of this guy's videos, despite his large number of subscribers. Odd that. There are good auditors, there are great auditors, and then there are some douchebags who just don't know how to calibrate their behavior to the situation. Without seeing the video of this particular altercation, I can't say if that's the case here, but it sounds like he's a hot head. That said, the article itself, even though its completely sympathetic to the cops, doesn't inform us of a single crime he committed. So it sounds like he got 6 months for being mean to the police. And it always boils my blood when some black-robed fuckwit starts throwing around the phrase "my courtroom". No, it's not yours. You didn't pay for it and you don't own it.
It brings to mind my favorite auditor, Focus Pocus in the U.K. In his most recent video he was giving it a dyke officer about the thin blue line Union Jack patch on her uniform and she got all butt hurt and snarked, "I hope you're never in a position where you have to lower yourself to the point that we have to come and help you." Without missing a beat he replied, "Well if you do, it won't be help, it will be service that I pay for." He actually shut her up for a few seconds. Just a few, mind you.
|
|
|
|
Post by srossi on Apr 5, 2024 13:23:29 GMT
I would need to read his story from a real news source before commenting. I’ve honestly never heard of him before.
|
|
|
|
Post by kargol on Apr 5, 2024 16:48:30 GMT
And it always boils my blood when some black-robed fuckwit starts throwing around the phrase " my courtroom". No, it's not yours. You didn't pay for it and you don't own it. Presumably you never refer to "my seat" when at a football match or a pub? |
|
|
|
Post by KGB on Apr 5, 2024 17:50:16 GMT
And it always boils my blood when some black-robed fuckwit starts throwing around the phrase " my courtroom". No, it's not yours. You didn't pay for it and you don't own it. Presumably you never refer to "my seat" when at a football match or a pub? Are those two situations analogous? I don't think so. At a football match or a pub I'm paying out of pocket for the privilege of sitting there; there's a transaction involved. Furthermore, those locations are privately held and not the property of the public at large. Also, the judge didn't say "my seat", he said "my courtroom" which it most certainly is not. I don't ever recall saying "my pub" or "my stadium" while in one of the aforementioned locations. |
|
|
|
Post by kargol on Apr 5, 2024 20:43:58 GMT
Presumably you never refer to "my seat" when at a football match or a pub? Are those two situations analogous? I don't think so. At a football match or a pub I'm paying out of pocket for the privilege of sitting there; there's a transaction involved. Furthermore, those locations are privately held and not the property of the public at large. Also, the judge didn't say "my seat", he said "my courtroom" which it most certainly is not. Yes. At a football match you are in essence a licensed occupier of that seat. Judges normally have courtrooms allocated to them and are required to work out of them. It's not uncommon for judges to refer to "my court" or whatever to add immediacy to a point. Usually to stop bad language or witness intimidation. It's a lot less pompous than saying "the King's court". |
|
|
|
Post by brodiescomics on Apr 8, 2024 17:25:35 GMT
I watch those auditor videos all the time. I mainly watch them because I am hoping to see them get their ass kicked. Sorta like those prank videos where the prankster gets fucked up. Fuck every single one of those guys. They are doing nothing to help anyone.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Ultimate Sin on Apr 9, 2024 4:27:05 GMT
I watch those auditor videos all the time. I mainly watch them because I am hoping to see them get their ass kicked. Sorta like those prank videos where the prankster gets fucked up. Fuck every single one of those guys. They are doing nothing to help anyone. I agree. I want to see bad cops be held accountable, but acting like an asshole just so you can whine that cops are oppressing you is fake and bullshit. Which is pretty much what the guy in this thread does. I watched a different guy film a house for no reason other than to bait the cops into asking him why he was filming a private residence and then refuse to answer or show ID, and then threaten to sue the cops if they didn't stop harassing him. I'm not sure of the law, but he didn't live in that neighborhood was was filming a family's house, so the dad got concerned and call the cops, because he didn't know if some perv was filming his kids. The cops asked who he was and why he was there and of course, he claimed they were harassing him and refused to answer them or leave. People like that serve no purpose. He didn't catch bad cops in the act. He created a false situation and then claimed harassment when the cops got called for the shit he started. |
|
|
|
Post by KGB on Apr 9, 2024 17:24:11 GMT
There are no doubt auditors that are natural-born rabble rousers and choose to express themselves through antagonizing LEOs with no end goal in mind, but you cannot discount the practice based on their behavior. There are no shortage of top notch auditors on both sides of the pond who are doing fantastic work in bringing rogue cops to heel. Most notably, Phillip Turner - a.k.a. "The Battousai" - was able to get the 5th Circuit Court of appeals to rule on the legality of filming the police in the course of their duties, see Turner v. Driver, 5th Circuit, 2017. So many Circuit Courts have now ruled this way that it seems unlikely SCOTUS will ever take up the matter as it's fairly settled law, partially due to the efforts of auditors to create and uphold that right.
I can see the point in filming private property from a public space but I also question the necessity of using that tactic. In my mind it's better to stick to filming governmental buildings and officials or corporations. The point is that that with few exceptions such activities are legal...and yet in the majority of these cases, the police will attempt to inhibit your right do to so by aggressive questioning, giving orders, demanding ID, etc. They're asking you to account for a legal activity and that's not something I can abide.
The best auditors deal with this calmly and dismissively, forcing the police to follow the law and treat the public in a just manner. It's an uphill battle, but I've seen lots of great work done.
|
|
